Advanced Search

Vital Surveillances: Epidemiological Characteristics of Sporadic Foodborne Diseases Caused byVibrio parahaemolyticus— China, 2013–2022

View author affiliations
  • Abstract

    Introduction

    Vibrio parahaemolyticus(V. parahaemolyticus) is a common foodborne pathogen in coastal areas of China. Most epidemiological studies onV. parahaemolyticushave focused on foodborne disease outbreaks, with fewer studies based on long-term, continuous, and systematic sentinel surveillance.

    Methods

    Data were collected from the national foodborne disease active surveillance program in 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China from 2013 to 2022.V. parahaemolyticus-positive cases were collected for further analysis in this study.

    Results

    From 2013 to 2022, the National Foodborne Disease Case Surveillance System identified 23,818 cases ofV. parahaemolyticusfoodborne infection in China. Patient ages ranged from 2 months to 100 years, with an average age of 38.41 years. These cases primarily occurred in coastal areas during summer. A new serotype, O10:K4, emerged in 2020 and has become the dominant serotype over O3:K6.

    Conclusions

    V. parahaemolyticusinfection is common in the eastern coastal areas of China and is strongly associated with aquatic food consumption. This study recommends that food regulatory authorities increase routine surveillance and inspection during high-risk periods and in high-risk areas. Authorities should also use social media platforms to conduct extensive public education campaigns on the prevention and control ofV. parahaemolyticus-associated foodborne disease.

  • loading...
  • Conflicts of interest:No conflicts of interest.
  • Funding:Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC2602303) , the Ningbo Public Welfare Science and Technology Project (Grant No.2023S149), and Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan (No. 2025KY280)
  • [1] Parveen S, Hettiarachchi KA, Bowers JC, Jones JL, Tamplin ML, McKay R, et al. Seasonal distribution of total and pathogenicVibrio parahaemolyticusin Chesapeake Bay oysters and waters. Int J Food Microbiol 2008;128(2):354 − 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.09.019.
    [2] Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, et al.Vibriospp. infections. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2018;4(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0005-8.
    [3] Letchumanan V, Chan KG, Lee LH.Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques. Front Microbiol 2014;5:705. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00705.
    [4] Martinez-Urtaza J, Baker-Austin C.Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Trends Microbiol 2020;28(10):867 − 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.02.008.
    [5] Zhang LL, Orth K. Virulence determinants forVibrio parahaemolyticusinfection. Curr Opin Microbiol 2013;16(1):70 − 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2013.02.002.
    [6] Li WW, Pires SM, Liu ZT, Ma XC, Liang JJ, Jiang YY, et al. Surveillance of foodborne disease outbreaks in China, 2003–2017. Food Control 2020;118:107359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107359.
    [7] Gonzalez-Escalona N, Gavilan RG, Toro M, Zamudio ML, Martinez-Urtaza J. Outbreak ofVibrio parahaemolyticussequence type 120, Peru, 2009. Emerg Infect Dis 2016;22(7):1235 − 7. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2207.151896.
    [8] McLaughlin JB, DePaola A, Bopp CA, Martinek KA, Napolilli NP, Allison CG, et al. Outbreak ofVibrio parahaemolyticusgastroenteritis associated with Alaskan oysters. N Engl J Med 2005;353(14):1463 − 70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa051594.
    [9] Seelman SL, Whitney BM, Stokes EK, Elliot EL, Griswold T, Patel K, et al. An outbreak investigation ofVibrio parahaemolyticusinfections in the United States linked to crabmeat imported from Venezuela: 2018. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2023;20(4):123 − 31. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2022.0078.
    [10] Fernández-Durán JJ, Gregorio-Domínguez MM. Testing for seasonality using circular distributions based on non-negative trigonometric sums as alternative hypotheses. Stat Methods Med Res 2014;23(3):279 − 92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280211411531.
    [11] Almagro-Moreno S, Martinez-Urtaza J, Pukatzki S.Vibrioinfections and the twenty-first century. Adv Exp Med Biol 2023;1404:1 − 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22997-8_1.
    [12] Wang LP, Zhou SX, Wang X, Lu QB, Shi LS, Ren X, et al. Etiological, epidemiological, and clinical features of acute diarrhea in China. Nat Commun 2021;12(1):2464. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22551-z.
    [13] Chen YS, Stine OC, Badger JH, Gil AI, Nair GB, Nishibuchi M, et al. Comparative genomic analysis ofVibrio parahaemolyticus: serotype conversion and virulence. BMC Genomics 2011;12:294. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-294.
    [14] Cui YJ, Yang XW, Didelot X, Guo CY, Li DF, Yan YF, et al. Epidemic clones, oceanic gene pools, and eco-LD in the free living marine pathogenVibrio parahaemolyticus. Mol Biol Evol 2015;32(6):1396 − 410. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv009.
    [15] Lu X, Zhou HJ, Du XL, Liu S, Xu JL, Cui ZG, et al. Population analysis of clinical and environmentalVibrio parahaemolyticusisolated from eastern provinces in China by removing the recombinant SNPs in the MLST loci. Infect Genet Evol 2016;45:303 − 10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2016.09.002.
  • FIGURE 1.Detection rate and number of cases of foodborne disease caused byV. parahaemolyticusin China from 2013 to 2022. (A) Detection rate; (B) Case number.

    Note: Map approval number: GS 京(2024)1947号.

    FIGURE 2.Time distribution and peak periods of foodborne disease caused byV. parahaemolyticusin China from 2013 to 2022. (A) Time distribution; (B) Peak periods.

    TABLE 1.Distribution of main serotypes ofV. parahaemolyticusfrom 2013 to 2022.

    Serotype Number (%)
    2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
    O3:K6 104
    (69.33)
    410
    (79.77)
    425
    (83.66)
    925
    (74.96)
    225
    (74.26)
    150
    (79.37)
    957
    (79.95)
    401
    (58.37)
    209
    (13.91)
    234
    (22.12)
    4040
    (55.03)
    O10:K4 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    139
    (20.23)
    1039
    (69.17)
    574
    (54.25)
    1752
    (23.86)
    O4:K8 37
    (24.67)
    56
    (10.89)
    61
    (12.01)
    164
    (13.29)
    45
    (14.85)
    18
    (9.52)
    117
    (9.77)
    44
    (6.40)
    31
    (2.06)
    20
    (1.89)
    593
    (8.08)
    O4:K4 8
    (5.33)
    1
    (0.19)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    7
    (2.31)
    7
    (3.70)
    1
    (0.08)
    8
    (1.16)
    64
    (4.26)
    68
    (6.43)
    164
    (2.23)
    O3:K4 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    3
    (1.59)
    1
    (0.08)
    24
    (3.49)
    43
    (2.86)
    21
    (1.98)
    92
    (1.25)
    O1:K1 0
    (0)
    1
    (0.19)
    1
    (0.20)
    14
    (1.13)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.53)
    29
    (2.42)
    6
    (0.87)
    11
    (0.73)
    18
    (1.70)
    81
    (1.10)
    O4:K6 0
    (0)
    1
    (0.19)
    8
    (1.57)
    46
    (3.73)
    4
    (1.32)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.08)
    4
    (0.58)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.19)
    66
    (0.90)
    O1:K4 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.66)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    7
    (0.47)
    23
    (2.17)
    32
    (0.44)
    O10:K60 0
    (0)
    17
    (3.31)
    2
    (0.39)
    6
    (0.49)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.53)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    4
    (0.27)
    1
    (0.09)
    31
    (0.42)
    O10:K24 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.08)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    9
    (1.31)
    15
    (1.00)
    1
    (0.09)
    26
    (0.35)
    O1:K56 0
    (0)
    2
    (0.39)
    1
    (0.20)
    4
    (0.32)
    1
    (0.33)
    0
    (0)
    4
    (0.33)
    2
    (0.29)
    6
    (0.40)
    5
    (0.47)
    25
    (0.34)
    O2:K5 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    15
    (1.25)
    9
    (1.31)
    1
    (0.07)
    0
    (0)
    25
    (0.34)
    O1:K3 1
    (0.67)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.39)
    1
    (0.08)
    4
    (1.32)
    0
    (0)
    6
    (0.50)
    1
    (0.15)
    2
    (0.13)
    3
    (0.28)
    20
    (0.27)
    O1:K6 0
    (0)
    1
    (0.19)
    0
    (0)
    5
    (0.41)
    1
    (0.33)
    0
    (0)
    4
    (0.33)
    4
    (0.58)
    0
    (0)
    5
    (0.47)
    20
    (0.27)
    O1:K36 0
    (0)
    7
    (1.36)
    0
    (0)
    5
    (0.41)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    3
    (0.25)
    2
    (0.29)
    1
    (0.07)
    1
    (0.09)
    19
    (0.26)
    O1:K25 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.20)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    13
    (1.09)
    2
    (0.29)
    1
    (0.07)
    0
    (0)
    17
    (0.23)
    O4:K68 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.20)
    1
    (0.08)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    7
    (0.58)
    0
    (0)
    8
    (0.53)
    0
    (0)
    17
    (0.23)
    O2:K3 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    5
    (0.41)
    0
    (0)
    3
    (1.59)
    6
    (0.50)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.19)
    16
    (0.22)
    O1:K5 0
    (0)
    1
    (0.19)
    1
    (0.20)
    1
    (0.08)
    2
    (0.66)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.29)
    3
    (0.20)
    5
    (0.47)
    15
    (0.20)
    O4:K9 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.20)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (1.06)
    2
    (0.17)
    2
    (0.29)
    3
    (0.20)
    1
    (0.09)
    11
    (0.15)
    O3:K8 0
    (0)
    1
    (0.19)
    1
    (0.20)
    4
    (0.32)
    3
    (0.99)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.08)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    10
    (0.14)
    O4:K55 0
    (0)
    2
    (0.39)
    0
    (0)
    2
    (0.16)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    4
    (0.27)
    2
    (0.19)
    10
    (0.14)
    O8:K4 0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    0
    (0)
    1
    (0.07)
    9
    (0.85)
    10
    (0.14)
    Others 0
    (0)
    14
    (2.72)
    3
    (0.59)
    50
    (4.05)
    9
    (2.97)
    4
    (2.12)
    30
    (2.51)
    28
    (4.08)
    49
    (3.26)
    63
    (5.95)
    250
    (3.41)
    Total 150
    (100.00)
    514
    (100.00)
    508
    (100.00)
    1,234
    (100.00)
    303
    (100.00)
    189
    (100.00)
    1,197
    (100.00)
    687
    (100.00)
    1,502
    (100.00)
    1,058
    (100)
    7,342
    (100)
    Download: CSV

Citation:

通讯作者:陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1.

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents

Article Metrics

Article views(1572) PDF downloads(12)Cited by()

Share

Related

Epidemiological Characteristics of Sporadic Foodborne Diseases Caused byVibrio parahaemolyticus— China, 2013–2022

View author affiliations

Abstract

Introduction

Vibrio parahaemolyticus(V. parahaemolyticus) is a common foodborne pathogen in coastal areas of China. Most epidemiological studies onV. parahaemolyticushave focused on foodborne disease outbreaks, with fewer studies based on long-term, continuous, and systematic sentinel surveillance.

Methods

Data were collected from the national foodborne disease active surveillance program in 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China from 2013 to 2022.V. parahaemolyticus-positive cases were collected for further analysis in this study.

Results

From 2013 to 2022, the National Foodborne Disease Case Surveillance System identified 23,818 cases ofV. parahaemolyticusfoodborne infection in China. Patient ages ranged from 2 months to 100 years, with an average age of 38.41 years. These cases primarily occurred in coastal areas during summer. A new serotype, O10:K4, emerged in 2020 and has become the dominant serotype over O3:K6.

Conclusions

V. parahaemolyticusinfection is common in the eastern coastal areas of China and is strongly associated with aquatic food consumption. This study recommends that food regulatory authorities increase routine surveillance and inspection during high-risk periods and in high-risk areas. Authorities should also use social media platforms to conduct extensive public education campaigns on the prevention and control ofV. parahaemolyticus-associated foodborne disease.

  • 1. Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo City, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 2. NHC Key Laboratory of Food Safety Risk Assessment, Food Safety Research Unit (2019RU014) of Chinese Academy of Medical Science; China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, China
  • 3. Zhejiang Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China
  • 4. Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing City, Jiangsu Province, China
  • 5. Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China
  • 6. Beijing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China
  • Corresponding author:

    Weiwei Li,weiweili@cfsa.net.cn

  • Funding:Supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2022YFC2602303) , the Ningbo Public Welfare Science and Technology Project (Grant No.2023S149), and Zhejiang Provincial Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan (No. 2025KY280)
  • Online Date:December 20 2024
    Issue Date:December 20 2024
    doi:10.46234/ccdcw2024.269
  • Vibrio parahaemolyticus(V. parahaemolyticus) is a Gram-negative, halophilic bacterium found globally in environments such as oceans, rivers, and seabed sediments (1). Infections withV. parahaemolyticusare caused by diverse serotypes, with O3:K6 reported as the most dominant (25). In China,V. parahaemolyticusis the most common foodborne pathogen causing sporadic foodborne disease in coastal areas and the leading etiologic agent of foodborne disease outbreaks (6). However, most epidemiological studies onV. parahaemolyticushave focused on foodborne disease outbreaks (79), with few studies based on long-term, continuous, and systematic sentinel active surveillance.

    • This study was conducted from 2013 to 2022 under the framework of the national foodborne disease active surveillance program in 31 provincial-level administrative divisions (PLADs) in China. The China National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment (CFSA) maintains and manages all national foodborne disease surveillance data and systems. According to the national foodborne disease surveillance plan, sentinel hospitals are responsible for collecting epidemiological information, clinical signs and symptoms, suspected food exposure information, and stool specimens from patients with diarrhea to test forSalmonella,Shigella,V. parahaemolyticus, diarrheagenicEscherichia coli, and norovirus, and to undertake identification and serotyping of positive strains. Cases positive forV. parahaemolyticuswere selected for further analysis in this study. Data cleaning and database creation were performed using Microsoft Office (version 2010, Microsoft, Washington, USA), and SPSS (version 22.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, USA) was used for statistical analysis. All variables were presented as counts or percentages. All procedures involving human participants followed the ethical standards of the ethics committee of Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention and were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (Approval No.: 202204).

    • From 2013 to 2022, the National Foodborne Disease Case Surveillance System documented 23,818 cases ofV. parahaemolyticusdiarrhea. Patient ages ranged from 2 months to 100 years (mean: 38.41 years), with 12,126 cases (50.91%) occurring in individuals aged 24–44 years. The most common symptoms were watery diarrhea (22,642 cases, 95.06%), abdominal pain (16,381 cases, 68.78%), nausea (11,158 cases, 46.85%), vomiting (9,593 cases, 40.28%), and fever (3,281 cases, 13.78%).

      Analysis of the overallV. parahaemolyticusdetection rate in sporadic diarrhea cases in China revealed a rate of 1.83% (23,818/1,298,516). Among the top 5 PLADs with the highest detection rates, Shanghai had the highest rate at 5.50% (2,352/42,759), followed by Zhejiang (3.45%, 11,751/340,354), Liaoning (3.43%, 1,054/30,711), Beijing (3.26%, 1,693/51,900), and Hainan (3.14%, 503/16,030). The 5 PLADs with the highest number of cases were Zhejiang (11,751 cases), Jiangsu (2,471 cases), Shanghai (2,352 cases), Beijing (1,693 cases), and Liaoning (1,054 cases), respectively. These PLADs accounted for 49.34% (11,751/23,818), 10.37% (2,471/23,818), 9.87% (2,352/23,818), 7.11% (1,693/23,818), and 4.43% (1,054/23,818) of the total cases. The distribution of detection rates and case numbers across these regions is illustrated inFigure 1.

      Figure 1.

      Detection rate and number of cases of foodborne disease caused byV. parahaemolyticusin China from 2013 to 2022. (A) Detection rate; (B) Case number.

      Note: Map approval number: GS 京(2024)1947号.

      Of the 23,818 foodborne disease cases caused byV. parahaemolyticus, 78.20% occurred between July and September. Using the circular distribution test (10), the peak occurrence ofV. parahaemolyticus-induced foodborne disease in China from 2013 to 2022 was determined to be August 12, with a peak period from July 3 to September 21. Analysis of the peak disease periods in 12 coastal PLADs with high disease incidence revealed a distinct pattern. Regions with higher latitudes and lower temperatures tended to have peak periods that started later, ended earlier, and were shorter in duration. Conversely, regions with lower latitudes and higher temperatures exhibited peak periods that started earlier, ended later, and lasted longer. Among the 12 coastal PLADs, Liaoning Province experienced the shortest peak period forV. parahaemolyticus-related diseases, from July 13 to August 24. In contrast, Hainan Province recorded the longest peak period, extending from June 14 to October 20. The time distribution and peak periods of cases from 2013 to 2022 are shown inFigure 2.

      Figure 2.

      Time distribution and peak periods of foodborne disease caused byV. parahaemolyticusin China from 2013 to 2022. (A) Time distribution; (B) Peak periods.

      A total of 81.88% of patients reported consuming suspicious foods, primarily aquatic animals and their derivatives (34.37%, 6,704/19,503). Meat and meat products were the second most common category (17.99%, 3,509/19,503), followed by various other foods (9.24%, 1,802/19,503).

      Among the 23,818 isolates from 2013 to 2022, 11,987 strains ofV. parahaemolyticuswere serotyped for somatic (O) antigen, achieving a serotyping rate of 50.33%. The major serotypes identified were O3 and O4, comprising 49.59% and 23.25%, respectively.Table 1revealed that 7,342 strains were further serotyped for both somatic (O) and capsular (K) antigens, accounting for a serotyping rate of 30.83%. Among these, the most prevalent serotypes were O3:K6 and O10:K4, representing 55.03% and 23.86%, respectively. Serotype O10:K4 emerged only in 2020 and became dominant in China in 2021–2022.

      Serotype Number (%)
      2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total
      O3:K6 104
      (69.33)
      410
      (79.77)
      425
      (83.66)
      925
      (74.96)
      225
      (74.26)
      150
      (79.37)
      957
      (79.95)
      401
      (58.37)
      209
      (13.91)
      234
      (22.12)
      4040
      (55.03)
      O10:K4 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      139
      (20.23)
      1039
      (69.17)
      574
      (54.25)
      1752
      (23.86)
      O4:K8 37
      (24.67)
      56
      (10.89)
      61
      (12.01)
      164
      (13.29)
      45
      (14.85)
      18
      (9.52)
      117
      (9.77)
      44
      (6.40)
      31
      (2.06)
      20
      (1.89)
      593
      (8.08)
      O4:K4 8
      (5.33)
      1
      (0.19)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      7
      (2.31)
      7
      (3.70)
      1
      (0.08)
      8
      (1.16)
      64
      (4.26)
      68
      (6.43)
      164
      (2.23)
      O3:K4 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      3
      (1.59)
      1
      (0.08)
      24
      (3.49)
      43
      (2.86)
      21
      (1.98)
      92
      (1.25)
      O1:K1 0
      (0)
      1
      (0.19)
      1
      (0.20)
      14
      (1.13)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.53)
      29
      (2.42)
      6
      (0.87)
      11
      (0.73)
      18
      (1.70)
      81
      (1.10)
      O4:K6 0
      (0)
      1
      (0.19)
      8
      (1.57)
      46
      (3.73)
      4
      (1.32)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.08)
      4
      (0.58)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.19)
      66
      (0.90)
      O1:K4 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.66)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      7
      (0.47)
      23
      (2.17)
      32
      (0.44)
      O10:K60 0
      (0)
      17
      (3.31)
      2
      (0.39)
      6
      (0.49)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.53)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      4
      (0.27)
      1
      (0.09)
      31
      (0.42)
      O10:K24 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.08)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      9
      (1.31)
      15
      (1.00)
      1
      (0.09)
      26
      (0.35)
      O1:K56 0
      (0)
      2
      (0.39)
      1
      (0.20)
      4
      (0.32)
      1
      (0.33)
      0
      (0)
      4
      (0.33)
      2
      (0.29)
      6
      (0.40)
      5
      (0.47)
      25
      (0.34)
      O2:K5 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      15
      (1.25)
      9
      (1.31)
      1
      (0.07)
      0
      (0)
      25
      (0.34)
      O1:K3 1
      (0.67)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.39)
      1
      (0.08)
      4
      (1.32)
      0
      (0)
      6
      (0.50)
      1
      (0.15)
      2
      (0.13)
      3
      (0.28)
      20
      (0.27)
      O1:K6 0
      (0)
      1
      (0.19)
      0
      (0)
      5
      (0.41)
      1
      (0.33)
      0
      (0)
      4
      (0.33)
      4
      (0.58)
      0
      (0)
      5
      (0.47)
      20
      (0.27)
      O1:K36 0
      (0)
      7
      (1.36)
      0
      (0)
      5
      (0.41)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      3
      (0.25)
      2
      (0.29)
      1
      (0.07)
      1
      (0.09)
      19
      (0.26)
      O1:K25 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.20)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      13
      (1.09)
      2
      (0.29)
      1
      (0.07)
      0
      (0)
      17
      (0.23)
      O4:K68 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.20)
      1
      (0.08)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      7
      (0.58)
      0
      (0)
      8
      (0.53)
      0
      (0)
      17
      (0.23)
      O2:K3 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      5
      (0.41)
      0
      (0)
      3
      (1.59)
      6
      (0.50)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.19)
      16
      (0.22)
      O1:K5 0
      (0)
      1
      (0.19)
      1
      (0.20)
      1
      (0.08)
      2
      (0.66)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.29)
      3
      (0.20)
      5
      (0.47)
      15
      (0.20)
      O4:K9 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.20)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (1.06)
      2
      (0.17)
      2
      (0.29)
      3
      (0.20)
      1
      (0.09)
      11
      (0.15)
      O3:K8 0
      (0)
      1
      (0.19)
      1
      (0.20)
      4
      (0.32)
      3
      (0.99)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.08)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      10
      (0.14)
      O4:K55 0
      (0)
      2
      (0.39)
      0
      (0)
      2
      (0.16)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      4
      (0.27)
      2
      (0.19)
      10
      (0.14)
      O8:K4 0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      0
      (0)
      1
      (0.07)
      9
      (0.85)
      10
      (0.14)
      Others 0
      (0)
      14
      (2.72)
      3
      (0.59)
      50
      (4.05)
      9
      (2.97)
      4
      (2.12)
      30
      (2.51)
      28
      (4.08)
      49
      (3.26)
      63
      (5.95)
      250
      (3.41)
      Total 150
      (100.00)
      514
      (100.00)
      508
      (100.00)
      1,234
      (100.00)
      303
      (100.00)
      189
      (100.00)
      1,197
      (100.00)
      687
      (100.00)
      1,502
      (100.00)
      1,058
      (100)
      7,342
      (100)

      Table 1.Distribution of main serotypes ofV. parahaemolyticusfrom 2013 to 2022.

    • This study examined the epidemiological characteristics of foodborne diseases caused byV. parahaemolyticusin China using active surveillance data from 2013 to 2022. A total of 23,818 cases ofV. parahaemolyticusfoodborne illness were identified and collated through the national foodborne disease surveillance system. Distinct monthly peaks in cases were observed during warmer months, particularly from July to September. Coastal regions accounted for most cases, with a significantly higher detection rate ofV. parahaemolyticusthan inland areas. Analysis of the 23 serotypes detected revealed the diversity ofV. parahaemolyticus, with serotypes O3:K6 and O10:K4 being the most prevalent. Notably, serotype O10:K4 has become increasingly prominent, surpassing O3:K6 as the dominant serotype in China since 2021.

      This seasonality and coastal distribution ofV. parahaemolyticusinfection have also been observed in other countries. This phenomenon is thought to be associated with the thermophilic nature ofV. parahaemolyticus, as coastal residents have a higher risk of consuming raw, undercooked, or mishandled seafood (11). The duration of the disease peak varies by region, mainly related to latitude and local temperature conditions, which may affect the growth and reproduction ofV. parahaemolyticus. Recent studies have also shown a link between the appearance ofVibrioepidemic outbreaks and environmental factors, such as the oceanic transport of warm waters, providing a possible mechanism for the global dispersion ofVibriodiseases. In general, younger patients, particularly those under 5 years of age, tend to experience a higher frequency and variety of viral infections, while adults aged 18 to 45 are more susceptible to bacterial pathogens (12). This study agreed with this trend, as more than half of theV. parahaemolyticuscases occurred in the 24-44-year-old age group. This age distribution pattern could indicate a natural evolution in host immunity and/or dietary preferences that correlate with age. This study also revealed that the incidence of foodborne illnesses declined significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This decline may be attributed to policies, restrictions, and environmental and behavioral changes.

      Frequent recombination events around the O- and K-antigen coding gene cluster inV. parahaemolyticuscan lead to serotype transformation (1315). In recent years, the serotype O10:K4 has become increasingly prevalent, surpassing O3:K6 as the dominant serotype in China. This suggests that newV. parahaemolyticusantigens may emerge and spread in the future.

      This study was subject to some limitations. First, due to differing detection capabilities in sentinel hospitals, this study may not fully reflect the real-world epidemiological characteristics of foodborne disease caused byV. parahaemolyticus. Second, the actual number of foodborne disease cases may be larger than the number of monitored cases. This discrepancy may arise because foodborne disease often self-resolves, receives limited patient attention, and is prone to underreporting in the monitoring network. Third, the serotyping rate for both O and K antigens is relatively low and may not represent the true prevalence ofV. parahaemolyticusserotypes. Fourth, this study did not investigate the virulence factors ofV. parahaemolyticus.

      Based on the study results, food regulatory authorities should intensify routine surveillance and inspections targeting high-risk periods and locations. Oversight of production, marketing enterprises, and catering services should be strengthened, with a focus on crucial steps such as raw seafood processing and storage. Additionally, relevant departments should leverage social media to promote public awareness and education on preventing and controllingV. parahaemolyticus-related foodborne illnesses. This will improve public knowledge and self-protection regarding these illnesses.

    • All the sentinel hospitals and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 31 PLADs for their enthusiastic participation in the foodborne disease active surveillance.

  • Conflicts of interest:No conflicts of interest.
  • Reference (15)

    Citation:

    Catalog

      /

      Return
      Return
        Baidu
        map